My Learning Curve - Part 1
2 (ii) Equipment - Lenses
For each lens I have detailed my own personal reasons for purchase, general thoughts and particular likes/dislikes. I have also included a link to the FredMiranda review site for each lens.
Image of most used telephoto lenses. Left to right - Canon 100-400mm L IS, Canon 300mm F4 L IS plus 1.4x converter and EF II Extemsion Tube (my butterfly/drgaonfly kit), Canon 180mm L Macro plus 1.4x converter, Canon 70-200mm F2.8 L IS
Canon EF 100-400mm F4.5-5.6 L IS
Canon 100-400mm L IS, with camouflage tape, 100mm, without hood.
I purchased this lens due to its focal length range and specifically its 400mm capability, it can be used with extenders and converters (though you loose the auto focus capability with all canon cameras except the 1D series), tank like build (weight is not too much of an issue for me), image quality, Image Stabilisation, comparative value for money and wide second hand availability.
Canon 100-400mm L IS, with camouflage tape, 400mm, without hood.
If I had to have just one lens for wildlife photography, this would be it. My particular copy is a little soft wide open (the image quality suffers a little at f5.6) and so my ideal minimum f stop is 7.1. Its auto focus is not the quickest but it’s OK. The IS really pays dividends and I really appreciate its rugged design. I have not had dust suction problems due to the push/pull design in the 3 years I have owned mine and it has been used in some dusty environments, though I have heard this can be an issue. Speaking of the push/pull focal length arrangement, many hate this but I found I got used to it within hours.
Some people have reported problems when adding skylight protection filters to this lens. In certain circumstances a background image distortion can occur. I believe this may have occurred on two occasions in my 3 years of experience with this lens, though I am not 100% sure as the distortion does not exactly match examples I have seen on the web. My distortions may be noise related.
If this does occur people have recommended removing the skylight and using the lens naked. I think it is fair to say that some who report this may not be using top grade skylights so perhaps changing to a top Hoya or similar could be an option if you encounter this and you are not using a top grade skylight.
I considered Canon’s L series 28-300mm IS but after reading many reviews decided against it for image quality reasons. However I have reviewed this decision on many occasions and considering its focal range it definitely deserves serious consideration. My final decision was also swayed by the fact that the 28-300mmm lens does not tend to figure in ‘Professional’s’ lens bags.
Link To - Fredmiranda review
Link To - Photonet review of Canon 100-400mm L IS, Canon 70-300mm DO IS and 75-300mm IS
Canon EF 180mm f3.5 L Macro
Image of Canon 180mm L Macro and Canon 1.4x Extemder (with camouflage tape) without hood.
I purchased this lens for its focal length (and therefore ability to take macro pictures from a greater subject distance), image quality and rugged build. It accepts all Canons extenders and converters. It also makes an excellent medium telephoto lens.
It took me a long time to find a good second hand example of this lens at a sensible price, however it was worth the wait. The image quality is excellent. Macro auto focus is on the slow side, but I usually use manual focus when taking macro pictures. The auto focus speed improves greatly, as you would expect, when used as a medium telephoto. It is a long comparatively heavy lens. All in all It really is a quality piece of kit with a robust feel and excellent image quality. I considered the Sigma alternative and would have chosen that route if I could not have found a good second hand example.
Link To - Fredmiranda review
Canon EF 100mm f2.8 Macro
Image of Canon 100mm Macro, without hood.
I purchased this lens before I purchased the 180mm macro above. My original purchase decision was based on the need for an affordable Macro lens for butterflies and insects with top quality optics. It is also compatible with Canons extenders and converters.
I have a particular fond spot for this lens. It opened my eyes to the quality of prime lenses as opposed to a zoom lens. This lens is excellent value for money from an image quality point of view, is a reasonable weight and (according to others) makes an excellent portrait lens. My partner Jackie is more camera/lens weight conscious than I and now this lens goes everywhere with Jackie, teamed with a Cannon 70-300mm IS DO.
Link To - Fredmiranda review
Canon EF-S 17-85mm f4-5.6 IS USM
This lens was my first lens purchase for my first Digital SLR. My main reasons for purchase were focal length range, IS and price.
I must admit this lens, with hind sight, was quite disappointing; though on balance it was relatively inexpensive. The image quality was not great, though stopping down did improve this (i.e. using lens at around F8). At the time I thought the image quality was OK and it was the Camera and that was what digital images were like unless you bought a Canon 1D. However I now know better. I would say it is an OK lens for the money and the IS and focal length range are very useful, but for top quality images !!!.
Link To - Fredmiranda review
Canon EF-S 10-22mm f3.5-4.5 USM
I purchased this as a landscape lens for my 20D.
This is a lovely lens, very light with the widest angle image as you can get for a Canon 20D’s cropped sensor. Mine produces excellent quality images and I can’t say enough good things about it, though the price seems quite high compared to other EFS lenses.
Link To - Fredmiranda review
Canon EF 70-300mm f4-5.6 DO IS USM
I bought this as a ‘light weight’ alternative for my EF 100-400mm F4.5-5.6 L IS.
I used this for only a few months before it was ‘hijacked’ by Jackie :-). It is a little soft wide open but the images are very good from f6.3 and above. Compared to the Canon L 100-400mm it is very much lighter in weight, smaller in size and the auto focus appears to be slightly quicker. This is not a cheap lens, but it’s a definite class winner. If I had to choose just one wildlife lens and I couldn’t have the Cannon L 100 – 400mm IS lens (or weight was an issue) this would be my choice - If I could steal it back from Jackie.
Link To - Fredmiranda review
Link To - Luminous Landscape review
Link To - Official US Canon Site With Specifications for Canon 70-300mm DO IS
Canon EF 300mm f4 L IS
My reasons for this lens were image quality, F4, value for money, second hand choice and weight.
This lens, often mated with a 1.4x Extender, has turned out to be my most used lens. It has superb image quality, is lighter than my Canon L 100-400mm and I love the built in hood. The auto focus is medium paced but I can live with that most of the time. It also has the advantage of a relatively close minimum focus distance. Many of my butterfly pictures are taken with this lens on a Canon 20D with a 1.4x Extender plus a little cropping. I believe from a telephoto/image quality/value for money point of view this is one of Canon's best.
This is my principle wildlife ‘walk about’ lens.
Link To - Fredmiranda review
Link To - Digital Picture review
Link To - Castleman review
Link To - Ephotzine review
Canon EF 70-200mm f2.8 L IS
Image of Canon 70-200mm F2.8 IS (with camouflage covers), without hood.
I bought this lens for its Image quality, focal length range and F2.8.
The images produced by this lens are amazingly sharp. This is probably accentuated by the fact that it stays mated to a Canon 5D, but each time I use it I tell myself I should use it more often, the trouble is the focal length is quite limiting for my current wildlife opportunities. The auto focus is super fast and it just oozes quality build.
Note to self – use this lens camera combo more often, work on ways to get closer to the subject.
Link To - Fredmiranda review
Link To - Luminous Landscape review
Link To - Photozone review
Link To - Castleman review
Canon EF 500mm f4 L IS
Image Canon 500mm F4 L IS and Canon 300mm F4 IS on Canon 50D's with Battery Grips. Both protected by Wildlife Watching Supplies Lens Covers and Lens Coats.
My reasons for purchase were focal length, F4, Image quality, IS and build quality, dimensions and weight compared to Canon 600mm F4, compatibility with Canon 1.4x Extender to give 700mm F5.6, auto focus speed and comparative value for money. It can also be used hand held for short amounts of time.
Image Canon 500mm F4 L IS and Canon 300mm F4 IS on Canon 50D's with Battery Grips. Both protected by Wildlife Watching Supplies Lens Covers Link To - Wildlife Watching Supplies Lens Covers and Lens Coats Link To - Wildlife Watching Supplies Lens Coats, Neoprene Covers . Plus Protective lens lids for Canon 500mm F4 from Classic Kitchens, I have covered one side in camouflage tape. Link To - Classic Kitchens
Close-up image showing Classic Kitchens Lens Cover (lid) in place, I have added camouflage tape to the white lid.
What can I say, this lens does not disappoint. It does everything I hoped and more. I am in awe of this instrument. The image quality is stunning, the auto focus is lightning quick (even on a 30D so must be frightening on a 1D). The only down side is its size, which can limit its use, it also leaves you open to many comments from the public and I always feel a little more vulnerable to theft but that’s the same for any super telephoto. On the positive side, with some planning and willingness to lug it around, It really does give you the opportunities to take images that you just would not be able to take with anything less. It can be used in a considered fashion with a mono pod but really shines with a good Gitzo tripod, good ball head and Wimberley side kick.
Image of Canon 500mm F4 L IS mounted on Canon 50D, battery grip, Wildlife Watching Supplies lens covers, Gitzo carbon tripod, Wimberley Sidekick on Markins Ball head. Insulating foam added to tripod legs and covered with camouflage tape to improve comfort while carrying rig over the shoulder.
Image of Wimberley Sidekick mounted on Markins Ballhead and Gitzo carbon tripod.
Image of Wimbeley Sidekick.
Link To - Moose Peterson on Long Lens Technique
Link To - Naturephotographers Long Lens Technique and Also Use of Extenders
Link To - Fredmiranda review
Link To - Review of Cannon 500mm F4 Vs Sigma 500mm f/4.5 EX HSM
Link To - Review of Sigma 500mm f/4.5 by Stefan Ekernas
Link To - Luminous Landscape Review Canon 500mm Vs 600mm
Link To - Official US Canon Site for 500mm Lens Specifications and Accesories
Link To - General Comments Site For Canon 500mm
Canon EF 16-35mm f2.8 L
Image of Canon 16-35mm f2.8 and Canon 15mm f2.8 "Fish Eye".
This lens was purchased as a quality wide angle landscape lens.
It does just that. Matched with a Canon 5D the images are truly stunning. Enough said.
Link To - Fredmiranda review
Canon EF 24-70mm f2.8 L
This lens was purchased as a quality Landscape and general purpose lens. F2.8 being a bonus.
Image quality is stunning; I also love the weight and dimensions of this lens. It’s definitely one of my favourites.
Link To - Fredmiranda review
Link To - Castleman review
Canon EF 15mm f2.8 "Fish Eye"
I purchased this lens because I thought I needed a fish eye lens and this had a reputation for excellent image quality.
Sadly, at this point in time, I have not been able to make to much use of this lens and so cannot pass on many comments other than the auto focus is quite slow.
Note to self – Work on making more opportunities to use this lens.
Link To - Fredmiranda review
Examples Of Images Taken With Above Canon Lenses
The link below will take you to my Photo.net area, the gallery images contain details of equipment used, F stops, ISO and shutter speeds. Please bear in mind these images are low resolution web images, fine detail will therefore suffer.
- Link to my Photo.net area
The link below is a superb site which allows you to compare the image quality of lenses 'side by side', with and without extenders. Most Canon lenses are detailed here as well as some of the more popular Sigma and Tamron lenses.
- The-Digital-Picture.com